Paper detail

The blockage problem

We investigate the totally asymmetric exclusion process on Z, with the jump rate at site i given by r_i=1 for i nonzero, r_0=r. It is easy to see that the maximal stationary current j(r) is nondecreasing in r and that j(r)=1/4 for r>=1; it is a long outstanding problem to determine whether or not the critical value r_c of r such that j(r)=1/4 for r>r_c is strictly less than 1. Here we present a heuristic argument, based on the analysis of the first sixteen terms in a formal power series expansion of j(r) obtained from finite volume systems, that r_c=1 and that for r less than 1 and near 1, j(r) behaves as 1/4-γ\exp[-{a/(1-r)}] with a approximately equal to 2. We also give some new exact results about this system; in particular we prove that j(r)=J_max(r), with J_max(r) the hydrodynamic maximal current defined by Seppalainen, and thus establish continuity of j(r). Finally we describe a related exactly solvable model, a semi-infinite system in which the site i=0 is always occupied. For that system, the critical r is 1/2 and the analogue j_s(r) of j(r) satisfies j_s(r)=r(1-r) for r<=1/2; j_s(r) is the limit of finite volume currents inside the curve |r(1-r)|=1/4 in the complex r plane and we suggest that analogous behavior may hold for the original system.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.