Paper detail

The Black Hole Mass in Brightest Cluster Galaxy NGC 6086

We present the first direct measurement of the central black hole mass, M_BH, in NGC 6086, the Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG) in Abell 2162. Our investigation demonstrates for the first time that stellar dynamical measurements of M_BH in BCGs are possible beyond the nearest few galaxy clusters. We observed NGC 6086 with laser guide star adaptive optics and the integral-field spectrograph (IFS) OSIRIS at the W.M. Keck Observatory, and with the seeing-limited IFS GMOS-N at Gemini Observatory North. We combined the two IFS data sets with existing major-axis kinematics, and used axisymmetric stellar orbit models to determine M_BH and the R-band stellar mass-to-light ratio, M*/L_R. We find M_BH = 3.6(+1.7)(-1.1) x 10^9 M_Sun and M*/L_R = 4.6(+0.3)(-0.7) M_Sun/L_Sun (68% confidence), from models using the most massive dark matter halo allowed within the gravitational potential of the host cluster. Models fitting only IFS data confirm M_BH ~ 3 x 10^9 M_Sun and M*/L_R ~ 4 M_Sun/L_Sun, with weak dependence on the dark matter halo structure. When data out to 19 kpc are included, the unrealistic omission of dark matter causes the best-fit black hole mass to decrease dramatically, to 0.6 x 10^9 M_Sun, and the best-fit stellar mass-to-light ratio to increase to 6.7 M_Sun/L_Sun. The latter value is at further odds with stellar population studies favoring M*/L ~ 2 M_Sun/L_Sun,R. Biases from dark matter omission could extend to dynamical models of other galaxies with central stellar cores, and new measurements of M_BH from models with dark matter could steepen the empirical scaling relationships between black holes and their host galaxies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.