Paper detail

The Bivariate Size-luminosity Relations for Lyman Break Galaxies at z ~ 4 - 5

We study the bivariate size-luminosity distribution of Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) selected at redshifts around 4 and 5 in GOODS and the HUDF fields. We model the size-luminosity distribution as a combination of log-normal distribution (in size) and Schechter function (in luminosity), therefore it enables a more detailed study of the selection effects. We perform extensive simulations to quantify the dropout-selection completenesses and measurement biases and uncertainties in two-dimensional size and magnitude bins, and transform the theoretical size-luminosity distribution to the expected distribution for the observed data. Using maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE), we find that the Schechter function parameters for B-dropouts are α=-1.68^{+0.068}_{-0.095}, M*=-20.60^{+0.13}_{-0.17}, and ϕ*=1.79^{+0.32}_{-0.52} x 10^{-3} Mpc^{-3}. The log-normal size distribution is characterized by the peak R_0=1.34^{+0.099}_{-0.108} kpc at M_{1500}=-21 mag, width σ_{\lnR}=0.83^{+0.046}_{-0.044}, and the slope of the size-luminosity (RL) relation β=0.22^{+0.058}_{-0.056}. Similarly, for V-dropouts we find α=-1.74^{+0.15}_{-0.20}, M*=-20.53^{+0.24}_{-0.27}, ϕ*=1.55^{+0.62}_{-0.77} x 10^{-3} Mpc}^{-3}, R_0=1.19^{+0.21}_{-0.16} kpc, σ_{\lnR}=0.90^{+0.15}_{-0.065}, and β=0.25^{+0.15}_{-0.14}. The Schechter function parameters are consistent with the values in the literature, while the size distributions are wider than expected from the angular momentum distribution of the underlying dark matter halos. The slope of the size-luminosity (RL) relation is similar to those found for local disk galaxies, but considerably shallower than local early-type galaxies.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.