Paper detail

The birth rate of supernovae from double-degenerate and core-degenerate systems

We make a series of Monte Carlo simulations by a rapid binary evolution code and take two treatments of CE evolution, i.e. $α$-formalism and $γ$-algorithm. We find that only for the $α$-formalism with a high CE ejection efficiency, the shape of DTD from DD systems may be consistent with that derived observationally, i.e. a power low of $\sim t^{\rm -1}$, while the value of the birth rate of SNe Ia marginally matches with observations. For the $α$-formalism with a low CE ejection efficiency and the $γ$-algorithm, neither the shape of DTD nor the value of the birth rate can be compared with that from observations. Metallicity may not significantly change the shape of DTD, but a low metallicity may slightly increase the birth rate of SNe Ia by a factor of 2, especially for SNe Ia with long delay times. If the results from the single degenerate (SD) channel is incorporated into the DTD, both the shape of DTD and its value may be well consistent with observations for SNe Ia of younger than 2.5 Gyr, and SD and DD channels show a comparable contribution to total SNe Ia, while for SNe Ia with delay time longer than 2.5 Gyr, DD is the dominant channel and the birth rate is lower than that derived from observation by a factor up to $\sim4$. In addition, we calculate the evolution of various integral parameters of DD systems, and do not find any one suitable to explain the correlation between the brightness of SNe Ia and its delay time. Moreover, there are three channels producing core-degenerate(CD) systems which may contribute a few SNe Ia, but the contribution from CD systems to total SNe Ia is not more than 1%.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.