Paper detail

The bipartite unconstrained 0-1 quadratic programming problem: polynomially solvable cases

We consider the bipartite unconstrained 0-1 quadratic programming problem (BQP01) which is a generalization of the well studied unconstrained 0-1 quadratic programming problem (QP01). BQP01 has numerous applications and the problem is known to be MAX SNP hard. We show that if the rank of an associated $m\times n$ cost matrix $Q=(q_{ij})$ is fixed, then BQP01 can be solved in polynomial time. When $Q$ is of rank one, we provide an $O(n\log n)$ algorithm and this complexity reduces to $O(n)$ with additional assumptions. Further, if $q_{ij}=a_i+b_j$ for some $a_i$ and $b_j$, then BQP01 is shown to be solvable in $O(mn\log n)$ time. By restricting $m=O(\log n),$ we obtain yet another polynomially solvable case of BQP01 but the problem remains MAX SNP hard if $m=O(\sqrt[k]{n})$ for a fixed $k$. Finally, if the minimum number of rows and columns to be deleted from $Q$ to make the remaining matrix non-negative is $O(\log n)$ then we show that BQP01 polynomially solvable but it is NP-hard if this number is $O(\sqrt[k]{n})$ for any fixed $k$. Keywords: quadratic programming, 0-1 variables, polynomial algorithms, complexity, pseudo-Boolean programming.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.