Paper detail

The Binary Perfect Phylogeny with Persistent characters

The binary perfect phylogeny model is too restrictive to model biological events such as back mutations. In this paper we consider a natural generalization of the model that allows a special type of back mutation. We investigate the problem of reconstructing a near perfect phylogeny over a binary set of characters where characters are persistent: characters can be gained and lost at most once. Based on this notion, we define the problem of the Persistent Perfect Phylogeny (referred as P-PP). We restate the P-PP problem as a special case of the Incomplete Directed Perfect Phylogeny, called Incomplete Perfect Phylogeny with Persistent Completion, (refereed as IP-PP), where the instance is an incomplete binary matrix M having some missing entries, denoted by symbol ?, that must be determined (or completed) as 0 or 1 so that M admits a binary perfect phylogeny. We show that the IP-PP problem can be reduced to a problem over an edge colored graph since the completion of each column of the input matrix can be represented by a graph operation. Based on this graph formulation, we develop an exact algorithm for solving the P-PP problem that is exponential in the number of characters and polynomial in the number of species.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.