Paper detail

The binary evolution of SAX J1808.4-3658: Implications of an evolved donor star

Observations of the accretion powered millisecond pulsar SAX J1808.4-3658 have revealed an interesting binary evolution, with the orbit of the system expanding at an accelerated rate. We use the recent finding that the accreted fuel in SAX J1808.4-3658 is hydrogen depleted to greatly refine models of the progenitor and prior evolution of the binary system. We constrain the initial mass of the companion star to 1.0-1.2 M$_{\mathrm{\odot}}$, more massive than previous evolutionary studies of this system have assumed. We also infer the system must have undergone strongly non-conservative mass transfer in order to explain the observed orbital period changes. Following Jia & Li (2015), we include mass loss due to the pulsar radiation pressure on the donor star, inducing an evaporative wind which is ejected at the inner Lagrangian point of the binary system. The resulting additional loss of angular momentum resolves the discrepancy between conservative mass transfer models and the observed orbital period derivative of this system. We also include a treatment of donor irradiation due to the accretion luminosity, and find this has a non-negligible effect on the evolution of the system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.