Paper detail

The bimodal and Gaussian Ising Spin Glasses in dimension two revisited

A new analysis is given of numerical simulation data on the archetype square lattice Ising Spin Glasses (ISG) with a bimodal ($\pm J$) and Gaussian interaction distributions. It is well established that the ordering temperature of both models is zero. The Gaussian has a non-degenerate ground state so exponent $η\equiv 0$ and it has a continuous distribution of energy levels. For the bimodal model, above a size dependent cross-over temperature $T^{*}(L)$ there is a regime of effectively continuous energy levels; below $T^{*}(L)$ there is a distinct regime dominated by the highly degenerate ground state plus an energy gap to the excited states. $T^{*}(L)$ tends to zero at very large $L$ leaving only the effectively continuous regime in the thermodynamic limit. We show that in this regime the critical exponent $η$ is not zero, so the effectively continuous regime $2$D bimodal ISG is not in the same universality class as the $2$D Gaussian ISG. The simulation data on both models are analyzed using a scaling variable $τ= T^2/(1+T^2)$ suitable for zero temperature transition ISGs, together with appropriate scaling expressions. Accurate simulation estimates can be obtained for the temperature dependence of the thermodynamic limit reduced susceptibility $χ(τ)$ and second moment correlation length $ξ(τ)$ over the entire range of temperature from zero to infinity. The Gaussian critical exponent from the simulations $ν= 3.5(1)$ is in full agreement with the well established value from the literature. The bimodal exponent from the thermodynamic limit regime analysis is $ν= 4.2(1)$, once again different from the Gaussian value.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.