Paper detail

The Best Constraints on A Super-Eddington Accretion Flow: XMM-Newton Observations of An Intermediate-mass Black Hole

RX J1140.1+0307 (hereafter RX1140) is a Narrow Line Seyfert 1 (NLS1) with one of the lowest black hole masses known in an AGN (M ${\le} 10^6$ M$_{\odot}$). We show results from two new {\it XMM-Newton} observations, showing soft 2-10~keV spectra, a strong excess at lower energies, and fast X-ray variability as is typical of this class. The soft excess can be equally well fit by either low temperature Comptonisation or highly smeared, ionised reflection models, but we use a covariance analysis of the fast X-ray variability as well as lag and coherence spectra to show that the low temperature Comptonisation model gives a better description of the break in variability properties between soft and hard X-rays. Both models also require an additional component at the softest energies, as expected from the accretion disc. However, this inner disc spectrum does not join smoothly onto the variable optical and far UV emission (which should be produced in the outer disc) unless the mass is underestimated by an order of magnitude. The variable optical and far UV emission instead suggests that $L/L_{Edd}\sim 10$ through the outer disc, in which case advection and/or wind losses are required to explain the observed broadband spectral energy distribution. However, the similarity of the X-ray properties of RX1140 to other simple NLS1 such as PG 1244+026, RE J1034+396 and RX~J0136 means it is likely that these are also super-Eddington sources. This means their spectral energy distribution cannot be used to determine black hole spin despite appearing to be disc dominated. It also means that the accretion geometry close to the black hole is unlikely to be a flat disc as assumed in the new X-ray reverberation mapping techniques.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.