Paper detail

The Beachcombers' Problem: Walking and Searching with Mobile Robots

We introduce and study a new problem concerning the exploration of a geometric domain by mobile robots. Consider a line segment $[0,I]$ and a set of $n$ mobile robots $r_1,r_2,..., r_n$ placed at one of its endpoints. Each robot has a {\em searching speed} $s_i$ and a {\em walking speed} $w_i$, where $s_i <w_i$. We assume that each robot is aware of the number of robots of the collection and their corresponding speeds. At each time moment a robot $r_i$ either walks along a portion of the segment not exceeding its walking speed $w_i$ or searches a portion of the segment with the speed not exceeding $s_i$. A search of segment $[0,I]$ is completed at the time when each of its points have been searched by at least one of the $n$ robots. We want to develop {\em mobility schedules} (algorithms) for the robots which complete the search of the segment as fast as possible. More exactly we want to maximize the {\em speed} of the mobility schedule (equal to the ratio of the segment length versus the time of the completion of the schedule). We analyze first the offline scenario when the robots know the length of the segment that is to be searched. We give an algorithm producing a mobility schedule for arbitrary walking and searching speeds and prove its optimality. Then we propose an online algorithm, when the robots do not know in advance the actual length of the segment to be searched. The speed $S$ of such algorithm is defined as $S = \inf_{I_L} S(I_L)$ where $S(I_L)$ denotes the speed of searching of segment $I_L=[0,L]$. We prove that the proposed online algorithm is 2-competitive. The competitive ratio is shown to be better in the case when the robots&#39; walking speeds are all the same.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.