Paper detail

The BCS theory amended

In the standard theory of superconductivity a quasiparticle excitation changes the energy of the system by the quasiparticle energy. But the number of excitations determine also the gap energy which further determines the energy of the condensate and the energy spectrum of quasiparticles. Such extra contributions to the total energy of the system--which are not taken into account in the standard formalism--led us to a redefinition of the quasiparticle energies and of the quasiparticle populations by the usual method of the maximization of the superconductor partition function. The result of this correction is a critical temperature which is lower than the BCS critical temperature and a finite jump of the energy gap at the phase transition. The discontinuity of the energy gap at the critical temperature marks a first order phase transition which is also in disagreement with the standard BCS interpretation. The fact that the standard BCS formalism is theoretically inconsistent is revealed in the calculation of the heat capacity and of the internal energy. These inconsistencies are removed in our formulation. The purpose of our paper is not to adjust the theory to better describe the phenomenology of superconductivity, but to reevaluate and amend the BCS formalism.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.