Paper detail

The Basal Chromospheric Mg II h+k Flux of Evolved Stars: Probing the Energy Dissipation of Giant Chromospheres

Of a total of 177 cool G, K, and M giants and supergiants, we measured the Mg II h+k line emission of extended chromospheres in high-resolution (LWR) IUE spectra by using the IUE final data archive at STScI, and derived the respective stellar surface fluxes. They represent the chromospheric radiative energy losses presumably related to basal heating by the dissipation of acoustic waves, plus a highly variable contribution due to magnetic activity. Thanks to the large sample size, we find a very well defined lower limit, the basal chromospheric Mg II h+k line flux of cool giant chromospheres, as a function of T_eff. A total of 16 giants were observed several times, over a period of up to 20 years. Their respective minimal Mg II h+k line fluxes confirm the basal flux limit very well because none of their emissions dip beneath the empirically deduced basal flux line representative for the overall sample. Based on a total of 15 to 22 objects with very low Mg II h+k emission, we find as limit: log F_Mg_h+k = 7.33 log T_eff - 21.75 (cgs units; based on B-V). Within its uncertainties, this is almost the same relation as has been found in the past for the geometrically much thinner chromospheres of main sequence stars. Concerning any residual dependence of the basal flux on the surface gravity it can be stated that over a gravity range of more than four orders of magnitude (main-sequence stars to supergiants), the basal flux does not appear to vary by more than a factor of 2. These findings are in good agreement with the predictions by previous hydrodynamic models of acoustic wave propagation and energy dissipation, as well as with earlier empirical determinations. Finally, we discuss the idea that the ample energy flux of the chromospheric acoustic waves in a cool giant may yield, as a by-product, the energy flux required by its cool wind (i.e., non-dust-driven, "Reimers-type" mass-loss).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.