Paper detail

The baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation predicted by cold dark matter cosmogony

Providing a theoretical basis for the baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation (BTFR; baryonic mass vs rotational velocity in spiral galaxies) in the LCDM paradigm has proved problematic. Simple calculations suggest too low a slope and too high a scatter, and recent semi-analytic models and numerical galaxy simulations typically fail to reproduce some aspects of the relation. Furthermore, the assumptions underlying one model are often inconsistent with those behind another. This paper aims to develop a rigorous prediction for the BTFR in the context of LCDM, using only a priori expected effects and relations, a minimum of theoretical assumptions, and no free parameters. The robustness of the relation to changes in key galactic parameters will be explored. I adopt a modular approach, taking each of the stand alone galaxy relations necessary for constructing the BTFR from up-to-date numerical simulations of dark halos. These relations -- and their expected scatter -- are used to describe model spirals with a range of masses, resulting in a band in the space of the BTFR that represents the current best guess for the LCDM prediction. Consistent treatment of expected LCDM effects goes a large way towards reconciling the naive slope-3 LCDM prediction with the data, especially in the range 10^9 M_sun < M_bar < 10^11 M_sun. The theoretical BTFR becomes significantly curved at M_bar > 10^11 M_sun, but this is difficult to test observationally due to the scarcity of extremely high mass spirals. Low mass gas-rich galaxies have systematically lower rotational velocity than the LCDM prediction, although the relation used to describe baryon mass fractions must be extrapolated in this regime. The fact that the BTFR slope derived here is significantly greater than in early predictions is a direct consequence of a corresponding increase in the expected sensitivity of baryon mass fraction to total halo mass.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.