Paper detail

The baryon fraction distribution in X-rays galaxy clusters

The baryon fraction in galaxy clusters is one of the most direct way to constrain $\omo$. The baryonic fraction is estimated to be in the range fb = (0.15 - 0 .20) h^{-3/2} which is several times higher than expected from the observed light element abundances in $\omo=1$ universe, leading to the conclusion that we live in low density universe. In this work I will first present the various steps which lead to these results and then foccus on the distribution of the baryon fraction inside clusters. I will show that while the baryon fraction in clusters follows a scaling law, its theoretical expected shape does not agree with what is inferred from observations. I will show that when various systematics entering into the determination of clusters gas fraction are taken into account the observed baryon fraction profile matches better the predictions, provided that the average baryon fraction at the virial radius is lower than previously found fb~10%.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.