Paper detail

The Balmer Wavelength Range of BP Tauri

We have analyzed all the observations of BP Tauri taken by the International Ultraviolet Explorer in the low resolution (6 A), long wavelength (from 1850 to 3350 A) range. This dataset contains 61 spectra. These spectra do not show any correlation between the continuum flux and the MgII line flux, thus resolving a standing controversy in the literature concerning the origin of the MgII line flux. There is no correlation between the color temperature of the UV continuum and the average value of its flux. Using models of the accretion process developed by Calvet & Gullbring (1998), we obtain energy fluxes, accretion spot sizes, and accretion rates from the IUE observations of BP Tauri. We find average energy fluxes of 5.0 10^11 ergs cm^{-2} s^{-1}, average spot sizes of 4.4 10^{-3} times the stellar surface, and average accretion rates of 1.6 10^-8 msun/yr. Our analysis shows that the particle energy flux and the UV flux in the stellar surface are proportional to each other. Most strikingly, we observe a correlation between accretion rate and spot size, with the spot size increasing as the square of the accretion rate. Based on the results of a simulation, we conclude that geometrical effects are not enough to account for this effect. Current models of the accretion process fail to reproduce such an effect, suggesting the need of using more realistic descriptions of the stellar field when treating magnetospheric accretion. There may also be an unmodelled efficiency factor that determines how matter is loaded into the field lines.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.