Paper detail

The background-field formulation of the electroweak Standard Model

The application of the background-field method to the electroweak Standard Model and its virtues are reviewed. Special emphasis is directed to the Ward identities that follow from the gauge invariance of the background-field effective action. They are compatible with on-shell renormalization and imply a decent behavior of the background-field vertex functions. Via the usual construction of connected Green functions they transfer to Ward identities for connected Green functions which, in distinction to the conventional formalism, remain exactly valid in finite orders of perturbation theory even if a Dyson summation of self-energies (within a systematic use of one-particle irreducible building blocks) is performed. Finally, we comment on the interplay between gauge invariance and gauge-parameter (in-)dependence of vertex and Green functions and the uniqueness of resummation procedures.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.