Paper detail

The $B$ Anomalies and non-SMEFT New Physics

The modern viewpoint is that the Standard Model is the leading part of an effective field theory that obeys the symmetry $SU(3)_C \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$. Since the discovery of the Higgs boson, it is generally assumed that this symmetry is realized linearly (SMEFT), but a nonlinear realization (e.g., HEFT) is still possible. The two differ in their predictions for the size of certain low-energy dimension-6 four-fermion operators: for these, HEFT allows $O(1)$ couplings, while in SMEFT they are suppressed by a factor $v^2/Λ_{\rm NP}^2$, where $v$ is the Higgs vev. In this talk, I argue that (i) such non-SMEFT operators contribute to both $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$ and $b \to c \,τ^- {\barν}_τ$, transitions involved in the present-day $B$ anomalies, (ii) the contributions to $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$ are constrained to be small, at the SMEFT level, and (iii) the contribution to $b \to c \,τ^- {\barν}_τ$ can be sizeable. I show that the angular distribution in ${\bar B} \to D^* (\to D π') \, τ^{-} (\to π^- ν_τ) {\barν}_τ$ contains enough information to extract the coefficients of all new-physics operators. The measurement of this angular distribution can tell us if non-SMEFT new physics is present.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.