Paper detail

The Average Gap Distribution for Generalized Zeckendorf Decompositions

An interesting characterization of the Fibonacci numbers is that, if we write them as $F_1 = 1$, $F_2 = 2$, $F_3 = 3$, $F_4 = 5, ...$, then every positive integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-adjacent Fibonacci numbers. This is now known as Zeckendorf's theorem [21], and similar decompositions exist for many other sequences ${G_{n+1} = c_1 G_{n} + ... + c_L G_{n+1-L}}$ arising from recurrence relations. Much more is known. Using continued fraction approaches, Lekkerkerker [15] proved the average number of summands needed for integers in $[G_n, G_{n+1})$ is on the order of $C_{\rm Lek} n$ for a non-zero constant; this was improved by others to show the number of summands has Gaussian fluctuations about this mean. Kolo$\breve{\rm g}$lu, Kopp, Miller and Wang [17, 18] recently recast the problem combinatorially, reproving and generalizing these results. We use this new perspective to investigate the distribution of gaps between summands. We explore the average behavior over all $m \in [G_n, G_{n+1})$ for special choices of the $c_i$'s. Specifically, we study the case where each $c_i \in {0,1}$ and there is a $g$ such that there are always exactly $g-1$ zeros between two non-zero $c_i$'s; note this includes the Fibonacci, Tribonacci and many other important special cases. We prove there are no gaps of length less than $g$, and the probability of a gap of length $j > g$ decays geometrically, with the decay ratio equal to the largest root of the recurrence relation. These methods are combinatorial and apply to related problems; we end with a discussion of similar results for far-difference (i.e., signed) decompositions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.