Paper detail

The Atari Disk, a Metal-Poor Stellar Population in the Disk System of the Milky Way

We have developed a chemo-dynamical approach to assign 36,010 metal-poor SkyMapper stars to various Galactic stellar populations. Using two independent techniques (velocity and action space behavior), $Gaia$ EDR3 astrometry, and photometric metallicities, we selected stars with the characteristics of the "metal-weak" thick disk population by minimizing contamination by the canonical thick disk or other Galactic structures. This sample comprises 7,127 stars, spans a metallicity range of $-3.50<${\metal}~$<-0.8$, and has a systematic rotational velocity of $\langle V_ϕ\rangle=154$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ that lags that of the thick disk. Orbital eccentricities have intermediate values between typical thick disk and halo values. The scale length is $h_{R}=2.48^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$\,kpc and the scale height is $h_{Z}=1.68^{+0.19}_{-0.15}$\,kpc. The metallicity distribution function is well fit by an exponential with a slope of $Δ\log{\rm N}/Δ\metal=1.13\pm0.06$. Overall, we find a significant metal-poor component consisting of 261 SkyMapper stars with \metal$<-2.0$. While our sample contains only eleven stars with {\metal}~$\lesssim-3.0$, investigating the JINAbase compilation of metal-poor stars reveals another 18 such stars (five have {\metal}$<-4.0$) that kinematically belong to our sample. These distinct spatial, kinematic and chemical characteristics strongly suggest this metal-poor, phase-mixed kinematic sample to represent an independent disk component with an accretion origin in which a massive dwarf galaxy radially plunged into the early Galactic disk. Going forward, we propose to call the metal-weak thick disk population as the Atari disk, given its likely accretion origin, and in reference to it sharing space with the Galactic thin and thick disks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.