Paper detail

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: measuring radio galaxy bias through cross-correlation with lensing

We correlate the positions of radio galaxies in the FIRST survey with the CMB lensing convergence estimated from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope over 470 square degrees to determine the bias of these galaxies. We remove optically cross-matched sources below redshift $z=0.2$ to preferentially select Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). We measure the angular cross-power spectrum $C_l^{κg}$ at $4.4σ$ significance in the multipole range $100<l<3000$, corresponding to physical scales between $\approx$ 2--60 Mpc at an effective redshift $z_{\rm eff}= 1.5$. Modelling the AGN population with a redshift-dependent bias, the cross-spectrum is well fit by the Planck best-fit $Λ$CDM cosmological model. Fixing the cosmology we fit for the overall bias model normalization, finding $b(z_{\rm eff}) = 3.5 \pm 0.8$ for the full galaxy sample, and $b(z_{\rm eff})=4.0\pm1.1 (3.0\pm1.1)$ for sources brighter (fainter) than 2.5 mJy. This measurement characterizes the typical halo mass of radio-loud AGN: we find $\log(M_{\rm halo} / M_\odot) = 13.6^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access28 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.