Paper detail

The Asteroseismology of ZZ Ceti star GD1212

The ZZ Ceti star GD 1212 was detected to have 19 independent modes from the two-wheel-controlled Kepler Spacecraft in 2014. By asymptotic analysis, we identify most of pulsation modes. We find out two set of complete triplets, and four sets of doublet which are interpreted as rotation modes with $l=1$. For the other five modes, the four modes $f_{13}$, $f_{15}$, $f_{16}$ and $f_{4}$ are identified as ones with $l=2$; and the mode $f_{7}$ is identified to be the one with $l=1$. Meanwhile we derive a mean rotation period of $6.65\pm0.21$ h for GD 1212 according to the rotation splitting. Using the method of matching the observed periods to theoretical ones, we obtain the best-fitting model with the four parameters as $M_{\rm{*}}/M_{\rm{\odot}} = 0.775$, $T_{\rm{eff}} = 11400$ K, $\log (M_{\rm{H}}/M_{\rm{*}}) = -5.0$, $\log (M_{\rm{He}}/M_{\rm{*}})=-2.5$ for GD 1212. We find that due to the gradient of C/O abundance in the interior of white dwarf, some modes can not propagate to the stellar interior, which leads to the period spacing of the adjacent modes to become large. This feature is just proven by the observational data from GD 1212. All of these imply that GD 1212 may be evolved from an intermediate mass star.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.