Paper detail

The asphericity of random 2-dimensional complexes

We study random 2-dimensional complexes in the Linial - Meshulam model and prove that for the probability parameter satisfying $$p\ll n^{-46/47}$$ a random 2-complex $Y$ contains several pairwise disjoint tetrahedra such that the 2-complex $Z$ obtained by removing any face from each of these tetrahedra is aspherical. Moreover, we prove that the obtained complex $Z$ satisfies the Whitehead conjecture, i.e. any subcomplex $Z'\subset Z$ is aspherical. This implies that $Y$ is homotopy equivalent to a wedge $Z\vee S^2\vee...\vee S^2$ where $Z$ is a 2-dimensional aspherical simplicial complex. We also show that under the assumptions $$c/n<p<n^{-1+ε},$$ where $c>3$ and $0<ε<1/47$, the complex $Z$ is genuinely 2-dimensional and in particular, it has sizable 2-dimensional homology; it follows that in the indicated range of the probability parameter $p$ the cohomological dimension of the fundamental group $π_1(Y)$ of a random 2-complex equals 2.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.