Abstract

We report the archival discovery of Lyman-αα emission from the bright ultraviolet galaxy Y002 at z=7.677z=7.677, spectroscopically confirmed by its ionized carbon [CII] 158μμm emission line. The Lyαα line is spatially associated with the rest-frame UV stellar emission (MUVM_{\rm UV}~-22, 2x brighter than MUV⋆M^\star_{\rm UV}) and it appears offset from the peak of the extended [CII] emission at the current ~1" spatial resolution. We derive an estimate of the unobscured SFR(UV)=(22±1) M⊙(22\pm1)\,M_\odot yr−1^{-1} and set an upper limit of SFR(IR)<15 M⊙<15\,M_\odot yr−1^{-1} from the far-infrared wavelength range, which globally place Y002 on the SFR(UV+IR)-L([CII]) correlation observed at lower redshifts. In terms of velocity, the peak of the Lyαα emission is redshifted by ΔvΔv(Lyαα)~500 km s−1^{-1} from the systemic redshift set by [CII] and a high-velocity tail extends to up to ~1000 km s−1^{-1}. The velocity offset is up to ~3.5x higher than the average estimate for similarly UV-bright emitters at z~6-7, which might suggest that we are witnessing the merging of two clumps. A combination of strong outflows and the possible presence of an extended ionized bubble surrounding Y002 would likely facilitate the escape of copious Lyαα light, as indicated by the large equivalent width EW(Lyαα)=24−6+524^{+5}_{-6} Å. Assuming that [CII] traces the neutral hydrogen, we estimate a HI gas fraction of M(HI)/M⋆≳8M({\rm HI})/M_\star\gtrsim8 for Y002 as a system and speculate that patches of high HI column densities could contribute to explain the observed spatial offsets between Lyαα and [CII] emitting regions. The low dust content, implied by the non-detection of the far-infrared continuum emission at rest-frame ~160 μμm, would be sufficient to absorb any potential Lyαα photons produced within the [CII] clump as a result of large HI column densities.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.