Paper detail

The application of the fractional exclusion statistics to the BCS theory--a redefinition of the quasiparticle energies

The effective energy of a superconductor $E_{eff}(T)$ at temperature $T$ is defined as the difference between the total energy at temperature $T$ and the total energy at 0~K. We call the energy of the condensate, ${\mathcal E}_c$, the difference between $E_{eff}$ and the sum of the quasiparticle energies $E_{qp}$. ${\mathcal E}_c$, $E_{qp}$, as well as the BCS quasiparticle energy $ε$ are positive and depend on the gap energy $Δ$, which, in turn, depends on the populations of the quasiparticle states (equivalently, they depend on $T$). So from the energy point of view the superconductor is a Fermi liquid of non-ideal quasiparticles. We show that the choice of quasiparticles is not unique, but there is an infinite range of possibilities. Some of these possibilities have been explored in the context of the fractional exclusion statistics (FES), which is a general method of describing interacting particle systems as ideal gases. We apply FES here and transform the Fermi liquid of BCS excitations into an ideal gas by redefining the quasiparticle energies. The new FES quasiparticles exhibit the same energy gap as the BCS quasiparticles, but a different DOS, which is finite at any quasiparticle energy. We also discuss the effect of the remnant electron-electron interaction (electron-electron interaction beyond the BCS pairing model) and show that this can stabilize the BCS condensate, increasing the critical temperature.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.