Paper detail

The apparent anti-correlation between the mass opacity of interstellar dust and the surface-density of interstellar gas

Recent analyses of ${\it Herschel}$ observations suggest that in nearby disc galaxies the dust mass opacity at $500 \, {\rm μm}$, $κ_{500}$, decreases with increasing gas surface density, $Σ_{\rm ISM}$ (Clark et al. 2019). This apparent anti-correlation between $κ_{500}$ and $Σ_{\rm ISM}$ is opposite to the behaviour expected from theoretical dust evolution models; in such models, dust in denser, cooler regions (i.e. regions of increased $Σ_{\rm ISM}$) tends to grow and therefore to have increased $κ_{500}$. We show, using a toy model, that the presence of a range of dust temperatures along the line of sight can lead to spuriously low estimated values of $κ_{500}$. If in regions of higher $Σ_{\rm ISM}$ the range of dust temperatures extends to lower values (as seems likely), the magnitude of this effect may be sufficient to explain the apparent anti-correlation between $κ_{500}$ and $Σ_{\rm ISM}$. Therefore there may not be any need for spatial variation in the intrinsic dust properties that run counter to theoretical expectations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.