Paper detail

The anomalous $Wtb$ vertex and top-pair production at the LHC

We perform an exclusive study of the anomalous $Wtb$ interaction in the context of LHC. The limits on $Wtb$ anomalous couplings have been estimated via the measurements of the top-quark decay width and cross-section as well as production asymmetries in case the CP is violated. Our investigations reveal that the upper bounds on $(|C_L|, |C_R|)$ would be of about (1.82, 0.03) $\times 10^{-4}$ at $2.5 σ$ C.L., for the already collected data at the LHC with $\sqrt{S} = 13$ TeV for an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The corresponding limits for future hadron colliders, namely, High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), High Energy LHC (HE-LHC) and Future Circular Collider (FCC-hh) for the projected luminosities of 3 ab$^{-1}$, 12 ab$^{-1}$ and 30 ab$^{-1}$ are found to be to $(0.81, 0.006)\times 10^{-4}$, $(0.44, 0.0017)\times 10^{-4}$ and $(0.21, 0.0004)\times 10^{-4}$ respectively at 2.5$σ$ C. L..

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.