Paper detail

The Angular Momentum of Magnetized Molecular Cloud Cores: A 2D-3D Comparison

We study the rotational properties of magnetized and self-gravitating molecular cloud cores formed in 2 very high resolution 3D molecular cloud simulations.The simulations have been performed using the code RAMSES at an effective resolution of 4096^3.One simulation represents a mildly magnetically-supercritical cloud and the other a strongly magnetically-supercritical cloud.A noticeable difference between the 2 simulations is the core formation efficiency (CFE) of the high density cores.In the strongly supercritical simulations the CFE is ~33 % per free-fall time of the cloud tff,cl, whereas in the mildly supercritical simulations this value goes down to ~6%/tff,cl. A comparison of the intrinsic specific angular momentum j3D distributions of the cores with the distribitions of j2D derived using synthetic 2D velocity maps of the cores,shows that the synthetic observations tend to overestimate the true value of j by a factor of ~10.The origin of this discrepancy lies in the fact that contrary to the intrinsic determination which sums up the individual gas parcels contributions to j, the determination of j using the observational procedure which is based on a measurement on the global velocity gradient under the hypothesis of uniform rotation smoothes out the complex fluctuations present in the 3D velocity field. Our results provide a natural explanation for the discrepancy by a factor ~10 observed between the intrinsic 3D distributions of j and the corresponding distributions derived in real observations.We suggest that measurements of j which are based on the measurement of the observed global velocity gradients may need to be reduced by a factor of ~10 in order to derive a more accurate estimate of j in the cores.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.