Paper detail

The angular momentum of disc galaxies: implications for gas accretion, outflows, and dynamical friction

We combine constraints on the galaxy-dark matter connection with structural and dynamical scaling relations to investigate the angular momentum content of disc galaxies. For haloes with masses in the interval 10^{11.3} < M_vir/M_sun < 10^{12.7} we find that the galaxy spin parameters are independent of halo mass with <λ'_gal> = (J_gal/M_gal) / (\sqrt{2} R_vir V_vir) = 0.019^{+0.004}_{-0.003} (1sigma). This is significantly lower than for relaxed LCDM haloes, which have an average spin parameter <λ'_halo> = 0.031. The average ratio between the specific angular momentum of disk galaxies and their host dark matter haloes is therefore R_j = λ'_gal/λ'_halo = 0.61^{+0.13}_{-0.10}. This calls into question a standard assumption made in the majority of all (semi-analytical) models for (disc) galaxy formation, namely that R_j=1. Using simple disc formation models we show that it is particularly challenging to understand why R_j is independent of halo mass, while the galaxy formation efficiency (ε_GF, proportional to the ratio of galaxy mass to halo mass) reveals a strong halo mass dependence. We argue that the empirical scaling relations between ε_GF, R_j and halo mass require both feedback (i.e., galactic outflows) and angular momentum transfer from the baryons to the dark matter (i.e., dynamical friction). The efficiency of angular momentum loss need to decrease with increasing halo mass. Such a mass dependence may reflect a bias against forming stable discs in high mass, low spin haloes or a transition from cold-mode accretion in low mass haloes to hot-mode accretion at the massive end. However, current hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy formation, which should include these processes, seem unable to reproduce the empirical relation between ε_GF and R_j. We conclude that the angular momentum build-up of galactic discs remains poorly understood.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.