Paper detail

The anatomy of Boris type solvers and the Lie operator formalism for deriving large time-step magnetic field integrators

This work gives a Lie operator derivation of various Boris solvers via a detailed study of trajectory errors in a constant magnetic field. These errors in the gyrocenter location and the gyroradius are the foundational basis for why Boris solvers existed, independent of any finite-difference schemes. This work shows that there are two distinct ways of eliminating these errors so that the trajectory of a charged particle in a constant magnetic field is exactly on the cyclotron orbit. One way reproduces the known second-order symmetric Boris solver. The other yields a previously unknown, but also on-orbit solver, not derivable from finite-difference schemes. By revisiting some historical calculations, it is found that many publications do not distinguish the poorly behaved leap-frog Boris solver from the symmetric second-order Boris algorithm. This symmetric second-order Boris solver's trajectory is much more accurate and remains close to the exact orbit in a combined $nonuniform$ electric and magnetic field at time-steps greater than the cyclotron period. Finally, this operator formalism showed that Buneman's cycloid fitting scheme is mathematically identical to Boris' on-orbit solver and that Boris' E-B splitting is unnecessary.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.