Paper detail

The Analytical One-Loop Contributions to Higgs Boson Mass in the Supersymmetric Standard Model with Vector-like Particles

In the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) with additional vector-like particles (VLPs), we for the first time derive the particle mass spectra and the Feynman rules, as well as analytically calculate the one-loop contributions to the Higgs boson mass from the fermions and sfermions. After discussing and numerically analysing a cases without bilinear terms and a case with a (partial) decoupling limit, we find: (i) The corrections depend on the mass splittings between quarks and squarks and between vector-like fermions and their sfermions; (ii) There exists the (partial) decoupling limit, where the VLPs decouple from the electrwoeak (EW) energy scale, even when one of the VLPs is light around the EW scale. The reason is that the contributions to Higgs mass can be suppressed by the (or partial) decoupling effects, which can make the EW phenomenology very different from the MSSM; (iii) The SM-like Higgs boson with mass around 125 GeV gives strong constraints on the VLPs if the top squarks are around 1~TeV. Moreover, we present some numerical analyses to understand these unique features.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.