Paper detail

The analogue of Büchi's problem for function fields

Büchi's $n$ Squares Problem asks for an integer $M$ such that any sequence $(x_0,...,x_{M-1})$, whose second difference of squares is the constant sequence $(2)$ (i.e. $x^2_n-2x^2_{n-1}+x_{n-2}^2=2$ for all $n$), satisfies $x_n^2=(x+n)^2$ for some integer $x$. Hensley's problem for $r$-th powers (where $r$ is an integer $\geq2$) is a generalization of Büchi's problem asking for an integer $M$ such that, given integers $ν$ and $a$, the quantity $(ν+n)^r-a$ cannot be an $r$-th power for $M$ or more values of the integer $n$, unless $a=0$. The analogues of these problems for rings of functions consider only sequences with at least one non-constant term. Let $K$ be a function field of a curve of genus $g$. We prove that Hensley's problem for $r$-th powers has a positive answer for any $r$ if $K$ has characteristic zero, improving results by Pasten and Vojta. In positive characteristic $p$ we obtain a weaker result, but which is enough to prove that Büchi's problem has a positive answer if $p\geq 312g+169$ (improving results by Pheidas and the second author).

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.