Paper detail

The AMBRE Project: Spectrum normalisation influence on Mg abundances in the metal-rich Galactic disc

The abundance of α-elements provides an important fossil signature in Galactic archaeology to trace the chemical evolution of the different disc populations. High-precision chemical abundances are crucial to improving our understanding of the chemodynamical properties present in the Galaxy. However, deriving precise abundance estimations in the metal-rich disc ([M/H] > 0 dex) is still challenging. The aim of this paper is to analyse different error sources affecting magnesium abundance estimations from optical spectra of metal-rich stars. We derived Mg abundances for 87522 high-resolution spectra of 2210 solar neighbourhood stars from the AMBRE Project. For this purpose, the GAUGUIN automated abundance estimation procedure was employed. The normalisation procedure has a strong impact on the derived abundances, with a clear dependence on the stellar type and the line intensity. For non-saturated lines, the optimal wavelength domain for the local continuum placement should be evaluated using a goodness-of-fit criterion, allowing mask-size dependence with the spectral type. Moreover, for strong saturated lines, applying a narrow normalisation window reduces the parameter-dependent biases of the abundance estimate, increasing the line-to-line abundance precision. In addition, working at large spectral resolutions always leads to better results than at lower ones. The resulting improvement in the abundance precision makes it possible to observe both a clear thin-thick disc chemical distinction and a decreasing trend in the magnesium abundance even at supersolar metallicities. In the era of precise kinematical and dynamical data, optimising the normalisation procedures implemented for large spectroscopic stellar surveys would provide a significant improvement to our understanding of the chemodynamical patterns of Galactic populations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.