Paper detail

The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey: The infrared-radio correlation and AGN fraction of star-forming galaxies at z $\sim$ 4.4-5.9

We present the radio properties of 66 spectroscopically-confirmed normal star-forming galaxies (SFGs) at $4.4<z<5.9$ in the COSMOS field that were [C II] detected in the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) Large Program to INvestigate [C II] at Early times (ALPINE). We separate these galaxies ("CII-detected-all") into lower redshift ("CII-detected-lz", $\langle z\rangle=4.5$) and higher redshift ("CII-detected-hz", $\langle z\rangle=5.6$) sub-samples and stack multi-wavelength imaging for each sub-sample from X-ray to radio bands. A radio signal is detected in the stacked 3 GHz image of CII-detected-all and -lz samples at $\gtrsim3σ$. We find that the infrared-radio correlation of our sample, quantified by $q_{\mathrm{TIR}}$, is lower than the local relation for normal SFGs at $\sim$3$σ$ significance level, and is instead broadly consistent with that of bright sub-mm galaxies at $2<z<5$. Neither of these samples show evidence of dominant AGN activity in their stacked Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs), rest-frame UV spectra, or X-ray images. Although we cannot rule out the possible effect of the assumed spectral index and the applied infrared SED templates as at least partially causing these differences, the lower obscured fraction of star formation than at lower redshift can alleviate the tension between our stacked $q_{\mathrm{TIR}}$s and that of local normal SFGs. It is possible that the dust buildup, which primarily governs the IR emission in addition to older stellar populations, has not had enough time to occur fully in these galaxies, whereas the radio emission can respond on a more rapid timescale. Therefore, we might expect a lower $q_{\mathrm{TIR}}$ to be a general property of high-redshift SFGs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access29 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.