Paper detail

The ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the HUDF: Constraining cumulative CO emission at $1 \lesssim z \lesssim 4$ with power spectrum analysis of ASPECS LP data from 84 to 115 GHz

We present a power spectrum analysis of the ALMA Spectroscopic Survey Large Program (ASPECS LP) data from 84 to 115 GHz. These data predominantly probe small-scale fluctuations ($k=10$-$100$ h Mpc$^{-1}$) in the aggregate CO emission in galaxies at $1 \lesssim z \lesssim 4$. We place an integral constraint on CO luminosity functions (LFs) in this redshift range via a direct measurement of their second moments in the three-dimensional (3D) auto-power spectrum, finding a total CO shot noise power $P_{\textrm{CO,CO}}(k_{\textrm{CO(2-1)}}) \leq 1.9\times10^2$ $μ$K$^2$ (Mpc h$^{-1}$)$^3$. This upper limit ($3σ$) is consistent with the observed ASPECS CO LFs in Decarli et al. 2019, but rules out a large space in the range of $P_{\textrm{CO,CO}}(k_{\textrm{CO(2-1)}})$ inferred from these LFs, which we attribute primarily to large uncertainties in the normalization $Φ_*$ and knee $L_*$ of the Schechter-form CO LFs at $z > 2$. Also, through power spectrum analyses of ASPECS LP data with 415 positions from galaxies with available optical spectroscopic redshifts, we find that contributions to the observed mean CO intensity and shot noise power of MUSE galaxies are largely accounted for by ASPECS blind detections, though there are $\sim20$% contributions to the CO(2-1) mean intensity due to sources previously undetected in the blind line search. Finally, we sum the fluxes from individual blind CO detections to yield a lower limit on the mean CO surface brightness at 99 GHz of $\langle T_{\textrm{CO}} \rangle = 0.55\pm0.02$ $μ$K, which we estimate represents $68$-$80$% of the total CO surface brightness at this frequency.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.