Paper detail

The AGN Source Population in the Chandra Deep Field-North Survey: Constraints from X-ray Spectroscopy and Variability

We briefly report here on our ongoing X-ray spectroscopy and variability analyses of 136 faint X-ray sources discovered in the 2 Ms Chandra Deep Field North observations spanning 1.4x10-15 to 2x10-13 ergs s-1 cm-2. Most sources are adequatley fitted with a simple intrinsic absorption plus power-law model, although the resulting photon index is much lower than the canonical average unabsorbed spectral slope found locally (suggesting additional spectral complexity). Among the 136 sources, 7% show significant Fe (Ka) emission features, with equivalent widths in the range 0.1-1.3 keV. Two of these emission-line sources appear to be Compton thick. For the subset of sources with redshifts, we also find that fewer than 10% are likely to be Compton thick. Finally, ~60% of the sample show signs of long-term variability. This fraction climbs to ~90% for the bright sources (>500 cnts) or BLAGN.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.