Paper detail

The AGILE monitoring of Cygnus X-3: transient gamma-ray emission and spectral constraints

We present the AGILE-GRID monitoring of Cygnus X-3, during the period between November 2007 and July 2009. We report here the whole AGILE-GRID monitoring of Cygnus X-3 in the AGILE "pointing" mode data-taking, to confirm that the gamma-ray activity coincides with the same repetitive pattern of multiwavelength emission and to analyze in depth the overall gamma-ray spectrum by assuming both leptonic and hadronic scenarios. Seven intense gamma-ray events were detected in this period, with a typical event lasting one or two days. These durations are longer than the likely cooling times of the gamma-ray emitting particles, implying we see continuous acceleration rather than the result of an impulsive event such as the ejection of a single plasmoid which then cools as it propagates outwards. Cross-correlating the AGILE-GRID light curve with X-ray and radio monitoring data, we find that the main events of gamma-ray activity have been detected while the system was in soft spectral X-ray states (RXTE/ASM count rate > 3 counts/s), that coincide with local and often sharp minima of the hard X-ray flux (Swift/BAT count rate < 0.02 counts/cm^2/s), a few days before intense radio outbursts. [...] These gamma-ray events may thus reflect a sharp transition in the structure of the accretion disk and its corona, which leads to a rebirth of the microquasar jet and subsequent enhanced radio activity. [...] Finally, we examine leptonic and hadronic emission models for the gamma-ray events and find that both scenarios are valid. In the leptonic model - based on inverse Compton scatterings of mildly relativistic electrons on soft photons from the Wolf-Rayet companion star and from the accretion disk - the emitting particles may also contribute to the overall hard X-ray spectrum, possibly explaining the hard non-thermal power-law tail sometimes seen during special soft X-ray states in Cygnus X-3.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access37 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.