Paper detail

The ages, metallicities and element abundance ratios of massive quenched galaxies at z~1.6

We investigate the stellar population properties of a sample of 24 massive quenched galaxies at $1.25<z_\mathrm{spec}<2.09$ identified in the COSMOS field with our Subaru/MOIRCS near-IR spectroscopic observations. Tracing the stellar population properties as close to their major formation epoch as possible, we try to put constraints on the star formation history, post-quenching evolution, and possible progenitor star-forming populations for such massive quenched galaxies. By using a set of Lick absorption line indices on a rest-frame optical composite spectrum, the average age, metallicity [Z/H], and $α$-to-iron element abundance ratio [$α$/Fe] are derived as $\log(\mathrm{age}/\mathrm{Gyr})=0.04_{-0.08}^{+0.10}$, $\mathrm{[Z/H]}=0.24_{-0.14}^{+0.20}$, and $[α/\mathrm{Fe}]=0.31_{-0.12}^{+0.12}$, respectively. If our sample of quenched galaxies at $\langle z \rangle = 1.6$ is evolved passively to $z=0$, their stellar population properties will align in excellent agreement with local counterparts at similar stellar velocity dispersions, which qualifies them as progenitors of local massive early-type galaxies. Redshift evolution of stellar population ages in quenched galaxies combined with low redshift measurements from the literature suggests a formation redshift of $z_\mathrm{f} \sim 2.3$ around which the bulk of stars in these galaxies have been formed. The measured [$α$/Fe] value indicates a star formation timescale of $\lesssim 1$ Gyr, which can be translated into a specific star formation rate of $\simeq 1\,\mathrm{Gyr}^{-1}$ prior to quenching. Based on these findings, we discuss identifying possible progenitor star-forming galaxies at $z \simeq 2.3$. We identify normal star-forming galaxies, i.e, those on the star-forming main sequence, followed by a rapid quenching event, as likely precursors of the quenched galaxies at $\langle z \rangle = 1.6$ presented here.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.