Paper detail

The Age-Redshift Relation For Luminous Red Galaxies Obtained From the Full Spectrum Fitting and Its Cosmological Implications

The relative age of galaxies at different redshifts can be used to infer the Hubble parameter and put constraints on cosmological models. We select 23,883 quiescent luminous red galaxies (LRGs) from the SDSS DR7 and divide them into four sub-samples according to their velocity dispersions and each sub-sample is further divided into 12 redshift bins. The spectra of the LRGs in each redshift and velocity bin are co-added in order to obtain a combined spectrum with relatively high $S/N$. Adopting the GalexEV/SteLib model, we estimate the mean ages of the LRGs from these combined spectra by the full-spectrum fitting method. We check the reliability of the estimated age by using Monte-Carlo simulations and find that the estimates are robust and reliable. Assuming that the LRGs in each sub-sample and each redshift bin were on average formed at the same time, the Hubble parameter at the present time $H_0$ is estimated from the age--redshift relation obtained for each sub-sample, which is compatible with the $H_0$ value measured by other methods. We demonstrate that a systematic bias (up to $\sim 20%$) may be introduced to the $H_0$ estimation because of recent star formation in the LRGs due to the later major mergers at $z\la 0.4$, but this bias may be negligible for those sub-samples with large velocity dispersions. Using the age--redshift relations obtained from the sub-sample with the largest velocity dispersion or the two sub-samples with high velocity dispersions, we find $H_0= 65^{+7}_{-3}\kmsmpc$ or $H_0= 74^{+5}_{-4}\kmsmpc$ by assuming a spatially flat $Λ$CDM cosmology. With upcoming surveys, such as the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), even larger samples of quiescent massive LRGs may be obtained, and thus the Hubble parameter can be measured with high accuracy through the age--redshift relation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.