Paper detail

The Age of Globular Clusters

I review here recent developments which have affected our understanding of both the absolute age of globular clusters and the uncertainties in this age estimate, and comment on the implications for cosmological models. This present estimate is in agreement with the range long advocated by David Schramm. The major uncertainty in determining ages of globular clusers based upon the absolute magnitude of the main sequence turn-off remains the uncertainty in the distance to these clusters. Estimates of these distances have recently been upwardly revised due to Hipparcos parallax measurements, if one calibrates luminosities of main sequence stars. However, it is important to realize that at the present time, different distance measures are in disagreement. A recent estimate is that the oldest clusters are $11.5 \pm 1.3$ Gyr, implying a one-sided 95% confidence level lower limit of 9.5 Gyr, if statistical parallax distance measures are not incorporated. Incorporating more recent measures, including Hipparcos based statistical parallax measures, raises the mean predicted age to $12.8 \pm 1$ Gyr, with a 95 % confidence range of 10-17 Gyr. I conclude by discussing possible improvements which may allow a more precise age distribution in the near future.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.