Paper detail

The advection-dominated accretion flow for the anti-correlation between the X-ray photon index and the X-ray luminosity in neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries

Observationally, an anti-correlation between the X-ray photon index $Γ$ (obtained by fitting the X-ray spectrum between 0.5 and 10 keV with a single power law) and the X-ray luminosity $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}$, is found in neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries (NS-LMXBs) in the range of $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}\sim 10^{34}-10^{36}\ \rm erg\ s^{-1}$. In this paper, we explain the observed anti-correlation between $Γ$ and $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}$ within the framework of the self-similar solution of the advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF) around a weakly magnetized NS. The ADAF model intrinsically predicts an anti-correlation between $Γ$ and $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}$. In the ADAF model, there is a key parameter, $f_{\rm th}$, which describes the fraction of the ADAF energy released at the surface of the NS as thermal emission to be scattered in the ADAF. We test the effect of $f_{\rm th}$ on the anti-correlation between $Γ$ and $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}$. It is found that the value of $f_{\rm th}$ can significantly affect the anti-correlation between $Γ$ and $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}$. Specifically, the anti-correlation between $Γ$ and $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}$ becomes flatter with decreasing $f_{\rm th}$ as taking $f_{\rm th}=0.1, 0.03, 0.01, 0.005$, $0.003$ and $0$ respectively. By comparing with a sample of non-pulsating NS-LMXBs with well measured $Γ$ and $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}$, we find that indeed only a small value of $0.003\lesssim f_{\rm th}\lesssim 0.1$ is needed to match the observed anti-correlation between $Γ$ and $L_{\rm 0.5-10keV}$. Finally, we argue that the small value of $f_{\rm th}\lesssim 0.1$ derived in this paper further confirms our previous conclusion that the radiative efficiency of NSs with an ADAF accretion may not be as high as $ε\sim {\dot M GM\over R_{*}}/{\dot M c^2}\sim 0.2$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.