Paper detail

The active and passive populations of Extremely Red Objects

[abridged] The properties of galaxies with the reddest observed R-K colors (Extremely Red Objects, EROs), including their apparent division into passive and obscured active objects with roughly similar number densities, are a known challenge for models of galaxy formation. We produce mock catalogues generated by interfacing the predictions of the semi-analytical MORGANA model for the evolution of galaxies in a Lambda-CDM cosmology with the spectro-photometric + radiative transfer code GRASIL and Infrared (IR) template library to show that the model correctly reproduces number counts, redshift distributions and active fractions of R-K>5 sources. We test the robustness of our results against different dust attenuations and, most importantly, against the inclusion of TP-AGB stars in Simple Stellar Populations used to generate galaxy spectra, and find that the inclusion of TP-AGBs has a relevant effect, in that it allows to increase by a large factor the number of very red active objects at all color cuts. We find that though the most passive and the most obscured active galaxies have a higher probability of being selected as EROs, many EROs have intermediate properties and the population does not show bimodality in specific star formation rate (SSFR). We predict that deep observations in the Far-IR, from 100 to 500 micron, are the most efficient way to constrain the SSFR of these objects; we give predictions for future Herschel observations. Finally, we test whether a simple evolutionary sequence for the formation of z=0 massive galaxies, going through a sub-mm-bright phase and then a ERO phase, are typical in this galaxy formation model. We find that this sequence holds for ~25 per cent of z=0 massive galaxies, while the model typically shows a more complex connection between sub-mm, ERO and massive galaxies. [abridged]

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.