Paper detail

The ACS LCID project. V. The Star Formation History of the Dwarf Galaxy \objectname[]{LGS-3}: Clues for Cosmic Reionization and Feedback

We present an analysis of the star formation history (SFH) of the transition-type (dIrr/dSph) Local Group galaxy \objectname[]{LGS-3} (Pisces) based on deep photometry obtained with the {\it Advanced Camera for Surveys} onboard the {\it Hubble Space Telescope}. Our analysis shows that the SFH of \objectname[]{LGS-3} is dominated by a main episode $\sim 11.7$ Gyr ago with a duration of $\sim$ 1.4 Gyr which formed $\sim 90%$ of the stars. Subsequently, \objectname[]{LGS-3} continued forming stars until the present, although at a much lower rate. The lack of early chemical enrichment is in contrast to that observed in the isolated dSph galaxies of comparable luminosity, implying that the dSphs were more massive and subjected to more tidal stripping. We compare the SFH of \objectname[]{LGS-3} with expectations from cosmological models. Most or all the star formation was produced in \objectname[]{LGS-3} after the reionization epoch, assumed to be completed at $z\sim6$ or $\sim 12.7$ Gyr ago. The total mass of the galaxy is estimated to be between 2 and $4\times 10^8$ M$_\odot$, corresponding to circular velocities between 28 km\ s$^{-1}$ to 36 km\ s$^{-1}$. These values are close to but somewhat above the limit of 30 km\ s$^{-1}$ below which the UV background is expected to prevent any star formation after reionization. Feedback from SNe associated with the initial episode of star formation (mechanical luminosity from SNe $L_w=5.3\times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$) is probably inadequate to completely blow away the gas. However, the combined effects of SN feedback and UV background heating might be expected to completely halt star formation at the reionization epoch for the low mass of \objectname[]{LGS-3}; this suggests that self-shielding is important to the early evolution of galaxies in this mass range.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access14 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.