Paper detail

The A2667 Giant Arc at z=1.03: Evidence for Large-scale Shocks at High Redshift

We present the spatially resolved emission line ratio properties of a ~10^10 M_sun star-forming galaxy at redshift z=1.03. This galaxy is gravitationally lensed as a triple-image giant arc behind the massive lensing cluster Abell 2667. The main image of the galaxy has magnification factors of 14+/-2.1 in flux and ~ 2 by 7 in area, yielding an intrinsic spatial resolution of 115-405 pc after AO correction with OSIRIS at KECK II. The HST morphology shows a clumpy structure and the Hα kinematics indicates a large velocity dispersion with V_{max} sin(i)/σ~ 0.73, consistent with high redshift disk galaxies of similar masses. From the [NII]/Hα line ratios, we find that the central 350 parsec of the galaxy is dominated by star formation. The [NII]/Hα line ratios are higher in the outer-disk than in the central regions. Most noticeably, we find a blue-shifted region of strong [NII]/Hα emission in the outer disk. Applying our recent HII region and slow-shock models, we propose that this elevated [NII]/Hα ratio region is contaminated by a significant fraction of shock excitation due to galactic outflows. Our analysis suggests that shocked regions may mimic flat or inverted metallicity gradients at high redshift.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.