Paper detail

The $a_0(980)$ and $Λ(1670)$ in the $Λ^+_c \to π^+ ηΛ$ decay

We propose to study the $a_0(980)$ and the $Λ(1670)$ resonances in the $Λ^+_c \to π^+ ηΛ$ decay via the final state interactions of the $π^+ η$ and $ηΛ$ pairs. The weak interaction part proceeds through the $c$ quark decay process: $c(ud) \to (s + u + \bar d)(ud)$, while the hadronization part takes place in two different mechanisms. In the first mechanism, the $sud$ cluster picks up a $q\bar{q}$ pair from the vacuum to form the $ηΛ$ meson-baryon pair while the $u\bar{d}$ pair from the weak decay hadronizes into a $π^+$. In the second, the $sud$ cluster turns into a $Λ$, while the $u\bar{d}$ pair from the $c$ decay picks up a $q\bar{q}$ pair and hadronizes into a meson-meson pair ($πη$ or $K\bar{K}$). Because the final $π^+ η$ and $ηΛ$ states are in pure isospin $I = 1$ and $I=0$ combinations, the $Λ^+_c \to π^+ ηΛ$ decay can be an ideal process to study the $a_0(980)$ and $Λ(1670)$ resonances. Describing the final state interaction in the chiral unitary approach, we find that the $π^+ η$ and $ηΛ$ invariant mass distributions, up to an arbitrary normalization, show clear cusp and peak structures, which can be associated with the $a_0(980)$ and $Λ(1670)$ resonances, respectively. The proposed mechanism can provide valuable information on the nature of these resonances and can in principle be test by facilities such as BEPCII.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.