Paper detail

The 750 GeV diphoton excess in unified $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times SU(4)$ models from noncommutative geometry

We discuss a possible interpretation of the $750$ GeV diphoton resonance, recently reported at the LHC, within a class of $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times SU(4)$ models with gauge coupling unification. The unification is imposed by the underlying non-commutative geometry (NCG), which in these models is extended to a left-right symmetric completion of the Standard Model (SM). Within such \textit{unified} $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R\times SU(4)$ models the Higgs content is restrictively determined from the underlying NCG, instead of being arbitrarily selected. We show that the observed cross sections involving the $750$ GeV diphoton resonance could be realized through a SM singlet scalar field accompanied by colored scalars, present in these unified models. In view of this result we discuss the underlying rigidity of these models in the NCG framework and the wider implications of the NCG approach for physics beyond the SM.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.