Paper detail

The 6dF Galaxy Velocity Survey: Cosmological constraints from the velocity power spectrum

We present scale-dependent measurements of the normalised growth rate of structure $fσ_{8}(k, z=0)$ using only the peculiar motions of galaxies. We use data from the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey velocity sample (6dFGSv) together with a newly-compiled sample of low-redshift $(z < 0.07)$ type Ia supernovae. We constrain the growth rate in a series of $Δk \sim 0.03 h{\rm Mpc^{-1}}$ bins to $\sim35\%$ precision, including a measurement on scales $>300 h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$, which represents one of the largest-scale growth rate measurement to date. We find no evidence for a scale dependence in the growth rate, or any statistically significant variation from the growth rate as predicted by the {\it Planck} cosmology. Bringing all the scales together, we determine the normalised growth rate at $z=0$ to $\sim15\%$ in a manner {\it independent} of galaxy bias and in excellent agreement with the constraint from the measurements of redshift-space distortions from 6dFGS. We pay particular attention to systematic errors. We point out that the intrinsic scatter present in Fundamental-Plane and Tully-Fisher relations is only Gaussian in logarithmic distance units; wrongly assuming it is Gaussian in linear (velocity) units can bias cosmological constraints. We also analytically marginalise over zero-point errors in distance indicators, validate the accuracy of all our constraints using numerical simulations, and demonstrate how to combine different (correlated) velocity surveys using a matrix `hyper-parameter' analysis. Current and forthcoming peculiar velocity surveys will allow us to understand in detail the growth of structure in the low-redshift universe, providing strong constraints on the nature of dark energy.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.