Paper detail

The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Dependence of halo occupation on stellar mass

In this paper we study the stellar-mass dependence of galaxy clustering in the 6dF Galaxy Survey. The near-infrared selection of 6dFGS allows more reliable stellar mass estimates compared to optical bands used in other galaxy surveys. Using the Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) model, we investigate the trend of dark matter halo mass and satellite fraction with stellar mass by measuring the projected correlation function, $w_p(r_p)$. We find that the typical halo mass ($M_1$) as well as the satellite power law index ($α$) increase with stellar mass. This indicates, (1) that galaxies with higher stellar mass sit in more massive dark matter halos and (2) that these more massive dark matter halos accumulate satellites faster with growing mass compared to halos occupied by low stellar mass galaxies. Furthermore we find a relation between $M_1$ and the minimum dark matter halo mass ($M_{\rm min}$) of $M_1 \approx 22\,M_{\rm min}$, in agreement with similar findings for SDSS galaxies. The satellite fraction of 6dFGS galaxies declines with increasing stellar mass from 21% at $M_{\rm stellar} = 2.6\times10^{10}h^{-2}\,M_{\odot}$ to 12% at $M_{\rm stellar} = 5.4\times10^{10}h^{-2}\,M_{\odot}$ indicating that high stellar mass galaxies are more likely to be central galaxies. We compare our results to two different semi-analytic models derived from the Millennium Simulation, finding some disagreement. Our results can be used for placing new constraints on semi-analytic models in the future, particularly the behaviour of luminous red satellites. Finally we compare our results to studies of halo occupation using galaxy-galaxy weak lensing. We find good overall agreement, representing a valuable crosscheck for these two different tools of studying the matter distribution in the Universe.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.