Paper detail

The 4-player gambler's ruin problem

This work explains how to utilize earlier results by P. Diaconis, K. Houston-Edwards and the second author to estimate probabilities related to the 4-player gambler ruin problem. For instance, we show that the probability that a very dominant player (i.e., a player starting with all but 3 chips distributed among the remaining players) is first to loose is of order $N^{-α}$ where $α$ is approximately $5.68$. In the $3$-player game, this probability is or order $N^{-3}$. We note it is futile to attempt to give heuristic/intuitive explanations for the value of $α$. This value is obtained via an explicit formula relating $α$ to the Dirichlet eigenvalue $λ$ (zero boundary condition) of the spherical Laplacian in the equilateral spherical triangle on the unit sphere $\mathbb S^2$ that corresponds to a unit simplex with one vertex placed at the origin in Euclidean $3$-space. The value of $λ$ is estimated using a finite-difference-type algorithm developed by Grady Wright.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.