Paper detail

The 3x3 rooks graph is the unique smallest graph with lazy cop number 3

In the ordinary version of the pursuit-evasion game "cops and robbers", a team of cops and a robber occupy vertices of a graph and alternately move along the graph's edges, with perfect information about each other. If a cop lands on the robber, the cops win; if the robber can evade the cops indefinitely, he wins. In the variant "lazy cops and robbers", the cops may only choose one member of their squad to make a move when it's their turn. The minimum number of cops (respectively lazy cops) required to catch the robber is called the "cop number" (resp. "lazy cop number") of G and is denoted $c(G)$ (resp. $c_L(G)$). Previous work by Beveridge at al. has shown that the Petersen graph is the unique graph on ten vertices with $c(G)=3$, and all graphs on nine or fewer vertices have $c(G)\leq 2$. (This was a self-contained mathematical proof of a result found by computational search by Baird and Bonato.) In this article, we prove a similar result for lazy cops, namely that the 3x3 rooks graph ($K_3\square K_3$) is the unique graph on nine vertices which requires three lazy cops, and a graph on eight or fewer vertices requires at most two lazy cops.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.