Paper detail

The 3-4 $μ$m Spectra of Jupiter Trojan Asteroids

To date, reflectance spectra of Jupiter Trojan asteroids have revealed no distinctive absorption features. For this reason, the surface composition of these objects remains a subject of speculation. Spectra have revealed, however, that the Jupiter Trojan asteroids consist of two distinct sub-populations which differ in the optical to near-infrared colors. The origins and compositional differences between the two sub-populations remain unclear. Here we report the results from a 2.2-3.8 $μ$m spectral survey of a collection of 16 Jupiter Trojan asteroids, divided equally between the two sub-populations. We find clear spectral absorption features centered around 3.1 $μ$m in the less red population. Additional absorption consistent with expected from organic materials might also be present. No such features are see in the red population. A strong correlation exists between the strength of the 3.1 $μ$m absorption feature and the optical to near-infrared color of the objects. While traditionally absorptions such as these in dark asteroids are modeled as being due to fine-grain water frost, we find it physically implausible that the special circumstances required to create such fine-grained frost would exist on a substantial fraction of the Jupiter Trojan asteroids. We suggest, instead, that the 3.1 $μ$m absorption on Trojans and other dark asteroids could be due to N-H stretch features. Additionally, we point out that reflectivities derived from WISE observations show a strong absorption beyond 4$μ$m for both populations. The continuum of 3.1 $μ$m features and the common absorption beyond 4 $μ$m might suggest that both sub-populations of Jupiter Trojan asteroids formed in the same general region of the early solar system.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.